|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dr Richard Hunt |
BACTERIOLOGY | IMMUNOLOGY | MYCOLOGY | PARASITOLOGY | VIROLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VIROLOGY - CHAPTER NINE ANTI-VIRAL CHEMOTHERAPY
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reading: Murray et al Chapter 16 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TEACHING OBJECTIVES To elucidate the drugs that are currently used as anti-viral agents and to determine why they are effective agents. The mode to action of these drugs will be discussed |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SEE ALSO |
Anti-bacterial drugs such as the penicillin antibiotics have proved very successful since they act against a bacterial structure, the cell wall, that is not present in eukaryotic cells. In contrast, most anti-viral agents have proved of little use therapeutically since the virus uses host-cell metabolic reactions and thus, for the most part, anti-viral agents will also be anti-cell agents. Thus, the alternative approach of stimulating the host's immune responses using vaccines has been most often pursued. Nevertheless, there are activities (i.e. enzymes) that are virus-encoded and therefore offer potential virus-specific targets. This is particularly the case with the viruses that have large genomes and code for their own replication enzymes. Even so, unfortunately, many anti-virals that are apparently effective in vitro are ineffective in vivo. A successful anti-viral drug should: An ideal drug should be:
An ideal drug should NOT be:
Toxicity of an anti-viral drug may be acceptable if there is no alternative: such as, for example, in symptomatic rabies or hemorrhagic fever Obviously, a good drug must show much more toxicity to the virus than the host cell. We measure selectivity by the therapeutic index of the drug Therapeutic index (T.I.): Minimum dose that is toxic to cell Effective drugs have a T.I. of 100-1000 or better.
Just as with anti-bacterials, we must find a virus Achilles heel. This could be an enzyme that is unique to the virus so that the drug is not toxic to the host cell. The following is a list of viruses that are known to code for their own enzymes. Among the other enzymes are: proteases, mRNA capping enzymes, neuraminidases, ribonucleases, kinases and uncoating enzymes.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Molecular Structure pop-up boxes show chemical and three-dimensional structures |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The very first licensed anti-viral drug was idoxuridine (1963), a pyrimidine analog that inhibits viral DNA synthesis. It is still used topically for epithelial herpetic keratitis but has largely been replaced because other drugs are less toxic. It is toxic because it lacks specificity, i.e. the drug inhibits host DNA polymerization as well as that of the virus. One of the better anti-viral drugs that we have dates from 1983: Acyclovir (acycloguanosine) which is a purine analog. It inhibits herpes DNA replication. It is also a nucleoside analog but, in contrast to idoxuridine, is highly specific and does not exhibit severe toxic side effects...for the reason for this, see below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular targets for drugs
Figure 1 |
POSSIBLE PHASES OF LIFE CYCLE ON WHICH ANTI-VIRAL ATTACK MIGHT BE LAUNCHED
The life cycle of a virus comprises several stages such as binding to the cell surface, replication, protein synthesis etc. and all of these stages may be the target of anti-viral drugs. Among the life cycle stages that have been targeted by potential therapeutic agents are:
We shall look at each of these life-cycle stages (figure 1) in the following sections.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WEB RESOURCES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 1aAMD3100 |
BINDING TO RECEPTOR OR UPTAKE INTO INTRACELLULAR VESICLES There, were until recently, no good drugs that stop receptor binding by any virus (but see influenza sialidase inhibitor below). However, possibilities include the use a peptide that mimics the receptor such as soluble CD4 protein. This would bind HIV gp120 and stop it binding to the receptor on the cell surface. However, there is a stability problem. The soluble protein is rapidly broken down and cleared from the circulation, i.e. an efficacious concentration is not achieved for a useful period. Attempts have been made to stabilize proteins but little success has been achieved. There have been attempts to couple soluble CD4 to toxins to kill infected cells, again with little success. In some cases, soluble CD4 can make the virus more infectious in laboratory studies. It is not known why this happens but a possible explanation might be that binding to gp120 causes a conformational change in the latter giving it a higher affinity for the co-receptor that is important, along with CD4 antigen, in infection of a cell by HIV (see HIV chapter, section 7). It is also possible that soluble CD4 bound to gp120 might promote fusion. PRO 542 is a tetrameric form of soluble CD4 antigen genetically fused to an immunoglobulin for added stability. This CD4-immunoglobulin fusion protein comprises the D1 and D2 domains of human CD4 and the heavy and light chain constant regions of human IgG2. It has a high affinity for gp120. For HIV to infect a cell, it must bind both to CD4 antigen and to a co-receptor, a chemokine receptor. The chemokine receptors bind chemokines and these can block binding to HIV gp120. Derivatives of one such chemokine (RANTES) have been used as agents to block virus binding. In addition to binding to the CCR5 chemokine receptor, these derivatives, like the natural chemokine, down-regulate the co-receptor by endocytosis, making it more difficult for the virus to bind. Chemokines such as RANTES are pro-inflammatory and chemotactic for leukocytes but these properties can be reduced by chemical modification at the N-terminus. Such chemokine derivatives are excellent antagonists of HIV binding and can protect monkeys that are exposed to HIV in the vagina. Anti-co-receptor monoclonal antibodies are also being developed to block virus binding. Another approach is to use peptides that are analogous to the transmembrane sequence of the co-receptor; these disrupt the interaction between the seven transmembrane alpha helices of the co-receptor protein. AMD-3100
Agents that block fusion of HIV with the host cell by interacting with gp41 Enfuvirtide Peptides derived from gp41 can inhibit infection, probably by blocking the interaction of gp41 with cell membrane proteins during fusion or by stopping the conformational change that results from the association of two gp41 molecules and which is necessary for fusion. Enfuvirtide (Fuzeon) is a 36 amino acid peptide that corresponds to residues 127-162 of gp41 and blocks this conformational change. In clinical trials, a nearly two log reduction in plasma viral levels was achieved. This drug was approved in 2003 but recent reports suggest low bioavailability and the emergence of resistant mutants. There is a cavity on gp41 that could hold a small molecule inhibitor. Peptides containing D-amino acids that would fit this cavity have been identified and inhibit fusion OTHERS RFI-641 BMS-433771
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
UNCOATING Uncoating of the virus (i.e. the loss of the lipid
envelope of
membrane-containing viruses or the loss of nucleocapsid proteins in
non-enveloped viruses)
often occurs in low pH endosome or lysosomes, as the result of a pH-dependent fusogen.
Note: Some viruses do not need an acidic environment for fusion and fuse with the plasma membrane; this is the case with
herpes viruses and HIV and leads to the formation of
syncytia. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human rhinovirus with WIN V1 (arrows) buried in a pocket in the VP1
protein
|
Arildone
and the WIN compounds Chemical name: 4-(6-(2-Chloro-4-methoxy)phenoxy)hexyl-3,5-heptanedione Arildone and the WIN compounds inhibit uncoating of picornaviruses, which do not have a lipid membrane. The drug inserts into a canyon in VPI protein of virus and blocks ion transport. For more information see chapter 10, part 3. Pleconaril |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Figure 4 |
Rimantadine These drugs are good for oral prophylaxis against influenza A (but not influenza B). They are a good alternative to the vaccine in immunocompromised patients and the elderly. Other than this, they are not used much in western countries. Prophylactic rimantadine has been used a lot in countries of the former USSR. Both of these drugs are licensed for use in US. Interest in these drugs has rearisen because of the possibility of an avian flu pandemic since currently there is no vaccine for this type of influenza virus (H5N1) and it will take several months to develop a vaccine after the pandemic strain is identified. In the 2005-2006 influenza season, 92% of H3N2 strains examined had a mutations that would confer resistance to these drugs as did 25% of the H1N1 strains tested. Similar problems were seen in 2006-2007 and so these drugs are not recommended until the per cent resistance in the major circulating types drops.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WEB RESOURCES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Figure 5 |
NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS The best anti-viral drugs that we have are of this type. They are selective because:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three phosphates are added to thymidine. The first is added by the viral
enzyme and the remainder by cellular enzymesFigure 6 |
Thymidine kinase substrates The thymidine kinase (figure 6) of herpes simplex (and other) viruses allows the virus to grow in cells that do not have a high concentration of phosphorylated nucleic acid precursors. These are usually cells that are not replicating their genome (e.g. nerve cells). Resting cells do, however, have unphosphorylated nucleosides. By bringing in its own kinase, the virus can grow in non-dividing cells by phosphorylating the cells' nucleosides. The name of the enzyme is a bit of a misnomer since it can work on other nucleosides than thymidine (thymidine happens to be the best substrate), i.e. the enzyme is non-specific as to substrate. This is in contrast to the host cell thymidine kinase which is very specific to thymidine since the cell has other enzymes to phosphorylate the other nucleosides. This lack of specificity of the viral enzyme allows it also to work on nucleoside-analog drugs and phosphorylate them. The host enzyme, because of its greater specificity, is much less good at this (and often does not phosphorylate the drug at all). The fact that the viral enzyme is quite good at phosphorylating the drug has another advantage. We can administer the nucleoside-analog in a non-phosphorylated form. This is useful as it is difficult to get phosphorylated drug into the cell because plasma membranes are poorly permeable to phosphorylated compounds in the absence of a specific transport protein. Thus the need for activation restricts use of drug to viruses with their own thymidine kinase or that cause cell to overproduce the endogenous enzyme (which may, if we are lucky, activate the drug to a lesser degree). To recapitulate, the great use of these drugs results from the facts that:
Most nucleic acid synthesis inhibiting drugs are nucleoside analogs with an altered sugar, base or both. Acyclovir (acycloguanosine) is the best example of such a drug and is used to treat herpes virus infections. It gets into the cell across the plasma membrane as the nucleoside form and is then specifically phosphorylated inside the cell by herpes virus thymidine kinase to an active form. It then blocks DNA synthesis by inhibiting polymerization; it is a chain terminator.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AcyclovirFigure 7 |
DNA SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS (1) Sugar modifications
Acyclovir/Acycloguanosine HSV-1, HSV-2 and VZV are susceptible to acyclovir.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chain terminationFigure 8 |
Acyclovir is effective against herpes simplex keratitis, latent HSV, fever blisters (H. labialis), genital herpes. Acyclovir-resistant mutants are a problem after long term use and have been shown to result from changes in the thymidine kinase or polymerase gene. There is a prodrug form of acyclovir called Valaciclovir ((VACV), Zelitrex®, Valtrex®) which is an L- valine ester of the drug. This can be taken orally. Penciclovir Famciclovir
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acyclovir GancyclovirFigure 9 |
Ganciclovir Chemical name: 9-(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxymethyl)guanine Other names: DHPG, GCV, Cymevene®, Cytovene® - figure 9 This drug is very similar to Acyclovir, it just has an extra -OH. It is also available as a pro-drug called Valganciclovir which is an L-valine ester of Ganciclovir (Valcyte). Oral Valganciclovir will probably to replace intravenous Ganciclovir for therapy and prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. Ganciclovir is active against CMV for which it is the drug of choice. Acyclovir has some activity against CMV in culture but has not found much use in therapy of these infections because of the superiority of Ganciclovir. As with Acyclovir, Ganciclovir targets the viral DNA polymerase and acts as a chain terminator. In herpes virus-infected cells, it is phosphorylated first by the viral thymidine kinase and then by cell kinases to yield the triphospho form of the drug which is incorporated into and terminates the DNA chain. However, CMV does not encode a thymidine kinase. Instead, Ganciclovir is phosphorylated by a CMV-encoded protein kinase (UL97) which accounts for its specificity for infected cells. Selectivity is also achieved because the viral polymerase has 30 times greater affinity for Ganciclovir than the host enzyme. Normally, Ganciclovir is given intra-venously at a level of 10mg/kg
per day or orally at 3000mg/day. It
is often used for CMV retinitis in AIDS
patients for whom there is an intraocular (that is, intravitreal) implant known
as Vitrasert. This contains 4.5 mg Ganciclovir for localized therapy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ara-AFigure 10 |
Adenosine arabinoside Chemical name: 9-beta-D-Arabinofuranosyl-9H-purin-6-amine Other names: Vidarabine, Ara-A - figure 10 Acyclovir and Ganciclovir are chain terminators because they do not have a complete sugar ring; the appropriate 3' -OH group needed to form a phosphodiester bond during DNA elongation is missing. Adenosine arabinoside has a complete sugar but it is arabinose rather than ribose. This drug has severe side effects and is only used in potentially lethal disease. In addition, it is easily deaminated in the bloodstream to a less effective form, ara-hypoxanthine |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZTFigure 11A |
Zidovudine Chemical name: 3′-azido-2′,3′-dideoxythymidine Other names: Azidothymidine, AZT, Retrovir® - figure 11A This drug is also a chain terminator. It is phosphorylated by a cell kinase and so it can be used against viruses without their own thymidine kinase (e.g. HIV). Reverse transcriptase (RNA-dependent DNA polymerase) is more sensitive to the drug than human DNA-dependent DNA polymerase accounting for the specificity but there are severe toxicity effects. It is used as an anti-HIV type 1 and type 2 drug (see HIV chapters). Because of the use of RNA polymerase II in the synthesis of the viral genome of retroviruses and the consequent high rate of mutation of the virus, the selective pressure of the presence of the drug rapidly leads to the emergence of resistant viral mutants. All of these have mutations in reverse transcriptase. Because of the emergence of resistant mutants, AZT is administered in combination with other drugs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cidofovir Chemical name: 1-[( S )-3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]cytosine dihydrate (HPMPC) Other names: Vistide® - figure 11B Cidofovir is both a DNA chain terminator and DNA polymerase inhibitor. It is an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate (not a phosphate) in which the C-O-P bond in a nucleoside monophosphate has been replaced by a phosphonate (C-P) bond that provides an enzymatically stable derivative with a long half life. The drug is administered in the phosphonomethoxy-nucleoside form and is phosphorylated twice intracellularly to the active diphosphate form using two cellular kinases (pyrimidine nucleoside monophosphate kinase and pyrimidine nucleoside diphosphate kinase. A viral kinase is not involved, in contrast to acyclovir which is administered as the nucleoside form and the first phosphate is added by viral thymidine kinase). Cidofovir inhibits the DNA polymerases of a number of viruses at
concentrations that are substantially lower than those needed to inhibit
human DNA polymerases. It is active against herpes viruses with fewer
side effects than Ganciclovir although it does show nephrocytotoxicity
and a number of other side effects. It must be administered along
with probenecid in order to block renal tubular secretion of the drug. Cidofovir was recently (March 2007) used (along with an experimental drug, ST-246) in treating a case of eczema vaccinatum in a two-year old boy. This is an unusual side effect of smallpox vaccination in which the live vaccinia virus in the vaccine can be passed to contacts of the vaccinee who are usually immunocompromised. It this case, because of the eczema, the virus was able to enter the patient's skin cells and replicate, initially causing a widespread rash and then blisters with a central dimple which is indicative of vaccinia infection. The rash encompassed 50% of the patient's keratinized skin. Although eczema vaccinatum can be fatal, the patient was discharged after 48 days in hospital.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WEB RESOURCES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CASE REPORT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DDIFigure 12 |
Other sugar modifications:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DDCFigure 13 |
Zalcitabine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IDUFigure 14 |
(2) Base modifications These are pyrimidine analogs that are incorporated into DNA by the viral DNA polymerase. They form unstable base pairs and mis-translation results in mutant proteins. They are competitive inhibitors of the viral DNA polymerase after intracellular phosphorylation. Bromovinyl deoxyuridine (Brivudin) Chemical name: (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-2′-deoxyuridine, bromovinyldeoxyuridine Other names: BVDU, Zostex®, Zonavir®, Zerpex®. BVDU is used for treating HSV (type 1) and VZV. The drug is initially phosphoryalted by viral thymidine kinase, hence its specificity. It is used various HSV and VSV infections including HSV keratitis and genital herpes. It can be given orally or topically. Iodo-deoxyuridine (Idoxuridine) Chemical name: 5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine Other names: IDU, IUdR, Herpid®, Stoxil®, Idoxene®, Virudox® - figure 14 This is similar to BVDU and is now used mainly in eye drops or a topical cream for HSV keratitis. Trifluorothymidine (Trifluridine) Chemical name: 5-trifluoromethyl-2′-deoxyuridine Other names: TFT, Viroptic®. - figure 15 This is similar in its mode of action to BVDU and IDU. It also is activated by viral thymidine kinase. TFT is used as a topical cream or in eye drops for HSV keratitis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TrifluorothymidineFigure 15 |
Because of the problems with AZT and the other nucleoside analogs in the treatment of HIV, interest has grown in another approach to inhibiting the same enzyme, reverse transcriptase. Alternative drugs might be useful in combination therapy since there is a limit to the number of mutations that reverse transcriptase can bear without losing function. Clearly, mutations resistant to a non-nucleoside non-competitive inhibitor of reverse transcriptase would be at a different site in the enzyme from the mutation that makes the enzyme resistant to a competitive nucleoside analog. Non-nucleoside inhibitors are the most potent and selective reverse transcriptase inhibitors that we have, working at nanomolar concentrations. They have minimal toxicity in tests with cultured cells (anti-viral activity at 10,000 to 100,000-fold lower concentration than cytotoxic concentration) and have been shown to work synergistically with nucleoside analogs such as AZT. Moreover, they work against nucleoside-analog resistant HIV. Thus, these drugs have high therapeutic index and also show good bioavailablity so that anti-viral concentrations are readily achievable. They are non-competitive reverse transcriptase inhibitors that target an allosteric pocket on the reverse transcriptase molecule. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-competitive reverse transcriptase inhibitorsFigure 16 |
There is now a collection of such agents that are chemically distinct: Nevirapine
Delavirdine |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efavirenz
(Sustiva)Figure 17 |
Efavirenz Chemical name: (−)6-chloro-4-cyclopropylethynyl-4-trifluoromethyl-1,4-dihydro-2H-3,1-benzoxazin-2-one Other names: Sustiva®, Stocrin®. Formerly known as DMP-266 - figure 17 Efavirenz used in combination with other drugs, can suppress viral load at least as well as the protease inhibitor Indinavir in the equivalent combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In a comparison of viral load reduction with Efavirenz plus AZT plus 3TC, vs. a standard-of-care control group treated with Indinavir plus AZT plus 3TC, the Efavirenz combination suppressed viral load to below 400 copies in a significantly higher proportion of the volunteers than the control arm, at all time points between week 2 and week 24.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foscarnet Figure 18 |
4) Other non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors
Foscarnet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR
STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Figure 19a
|
DNA INTEGRATION Retroviruses copy their RNA genome into DNA using reverse transcriptase. The DNA may remain as a circular provirus or may be integrated into the cellular DNA. The latter is necessary for transcription to genomic and messenger RNA . Thus, integration is required for viral replication. Integration of viral DNA is effected by the integrase enzyme which is encoded in the pol gene. The necessity of integration for replication means that the integrase would be a selective drug target. Recently, a specific integrase inhibitor has been approved. Raltegravir Other names: Isentress® ,
MK-0518 - figure 19a RNA SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS Ribavirin An aerosol form is used against RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) and the drug is used intra-venously against Lassa fever. N.B. Ribavirin can antagonize the effect of AZT as was found in some initial combination therapy trials against HIV. Neplanocin A
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR
STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
RNA CLEAVAGE ENZYMES Ribozymes are RNA molecules that have catalytic properties among which are the specific cleavage of nucleic acids. Heptazyme is a ribozyme that cleaves hepatitis C RNA at highly conserved regions (thereby reducing the possibility of the development of resistance). It recognizes and cuts all known types of the hepatitis C virus, thereby stopping viral replication. Heptazyme has not been successful in clinical trials.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS Little progress has been made in the development of drugs that inhibit viral protein synthesis since viruses use host cell translation mechanisms. However, one drug in this class is available. Fomivirsen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The process of retrovirus protease activity in which the protease starts
as part of the POL polyprotein and then cleaves the polyproteinFigure 20 |
PROTEIN PROCESSING INHIBITORS Protease inhibitors Many viruses must cleave the proteins that they make. In the case of surface glycoproteins, this is usually carried out by a host protease in the secretory pathway (e.g. in Golgi body). In the case of internal proteins, such as the polymerase or the group-specific antigens (GAGs) of retroviruses and some other viruses, there is a viral protease that is encoded in the POL gene (figure 20). Active site-directed inhibitors of the HIV aspartyl protease have been developed as this enzyme is not similar to known host proteolytic enzymes and therefore the inhibitors should show specificity to viral proteins. The action of the HIV protease is crucial to viral infectivity. Now we have the promise of a drug regimen that can suppress indefinitely the progress of disease.(see also anti-HIV drug chapter) The anti-HIV protease inhibitors are all substrate analogs (figure 22). When used individually they can drive down viral load
to between one 30th and one 100th of initial value but
sub-optimal doses of these inhibitors, when used alone, can result in loss of suppression
after several months and an accumulation of multiple mutations in the protease gene giving
a high level of drug resistance. However, it should be noted that patients with sustained suppression do not
develop the resistant mutations. This seems to be because replication must be maintained
for the development of such mutations under the selective pressure of the drug.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WEB RESOURCES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saquinavir
Figure 21 |
Saquinavir (SQ) Ritonavir
This drug reduces AIDS-defining events and death by 58% compared to placebo. It causes nausea in 25% of patients. It is used as part of a triple drug highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). Indinavir Indinavir plus two anti-RT drugs (HAART) reduces HIV to such an extent that PCR cannot detect the virus in 85% of patients Amprenavir This is another protease inhibitor used in combination HAART therapy Nelfinavir Lopinavir Lopinavir is administered combined with Ritonavir, another protease inhibitor at a 4/1 ratio. Again, it is used as part of HAART. Atazanavir Bevirimat
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR
STRUCTURE |
Highly active anti-retroviral therapies (HAART) Combination therapies (triple drug cocktail, HAART) are very effective and can reduce viral load in the patient below detectable levels implying that HIV replication has ceased. One such HAART cocktail consists of zidovudine (AZT) , lamivudine (3TC), both nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and Indinavir, a protease inhibitor. Viral RNA levels before treatment, which may be as high as 11 million copies per ml, are reduced to undetectable levels in few weeks by this drug combination (we can measure as low as 20 copies /ml) (figure 23). The evidence suggests that there is NO replicating virus in these patients and this is sustained for several years. When treatment is stopped, however, the virus comes back because of latent virus in memory T cells and possibly other cells. Another triple drug combination consists of two nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir, (R)-9-(2-Phosphonylmethoxypropyl)adenine) and emtricitabine (2',3'-Dideoxy-5-fluoro-3'-thiacytidine) plus the non-nucleoside inhibitors of reverse transcriptase, efavirenz (Sustiva). The trouble with all of these complicated drug regimens is compliance. The components of HAART must be taken at different times, sometimes in the middle of the night as well as during the day sand must be taken with different foods. For example, failure to take saquinavir within 2 hours of high fat meal leads to no absorption of drug. On the other hand, Indinavir must be ingested with minimal food intake. In patients that fail to take the three drugs for a week, there is a marked rise in viral load. Non-compliance with protease inhibitor therapy is of serious concern as the new virus that emerges is resistant to the inhibitor being taken and also resistant to other protease inhibitors. This is a major problem since the new resistant mutants may be transmitted to others. Thus if a patient is known to be likely to be non-compliant he/she should probably not be offered the drugs since resistance can emerge so quickly and can be spread to contacts. The HAART is very expensive, for example the combination of zidovudine/lamivudine/protease inhibitor costs $12,000 per year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HIV-1 Protease Complexed With A Macrocyclic Peptidomimetic InhibitorRequires a Chime plug-in. Get Chime here - Click on thumbnail to open file Figure 22B
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This diagram derived from X-ray crystallography shows the dimeric HIV aspartyl protease
(ribbons). Aspartate residues are shown as ball and sticks. Note that four aspartates are
clustered at the active site of the enzyme. A protease inhibitor is shown fitting into the
active siteFigure 24 |
Can we cure an HIV infection with drug therapy?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
The requirement for neuraminidase in the life cycle of influenza virusFigure 24
|
PROTEIN MODIFICATION INHIBITORS
Zanamivir Oseltamivir OTHER TARGETS In the retrovirus life cycle, the targeting of the specific protease that is necessary for the formation of an infectious virus particle has been particularly successful. Earlier, reverse transcriptase inhibitors had also been successful but the nucleoside analogs cause severe side effects because they also inhibit the host's DNA polymerase. In contrast, the non-nucleoside inhibitors of reverse transcriptase show excellent therapeutic indices. In each case, however, monotherapy leads to the rapid emergence of resistant mutants. Many other possible targets for intervention in the life cycles of viruses are under investigation and, of course, the goal is specificity. In the case of the retroviruses, in addition to those drugs described above, inhibitors of the integrase are being extensively studied but none has yet made it to the clinic as routine treatment. Other interesting approaches can be found at the pages below
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WEB RESOURCES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOLECULAR
STRUCTURE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This page copyright
2007, The
Board of Trustees of the University of South Carolina |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||